untuk berbagi – untuk menyalin, mendistribusikan dan memindahkan karya ini
untuk menggubah – untuk mengadaptasi karya ini
Berdasarkan ketentuan berikut:
atribusi – Anda harus mencantumkan atribusi yang sesuai, memberikan pranala ke lisensi, dan memberi tahu bila ada perubahan. Anda dapat melakukannya melalui cara yang Anda inginkan, namun tidak menyatakan bahwa pemberi lisensi mendukung Anda atau penggunaan Anda.
berbagi serupa – Apabila Anda menggubah, mengubah, atau membuat turunan dari materi ini, Anda harus menyebarluaskan kontribusi Anda di bawah lisensi yang sama seperti lisensi pada materi asli.
Diizinkan untuk menyalin, mendistribusikan dan/atau memodifikasi dokumen ini di bawah syarat-syarat Lisensi Dokumentasi Bebas GNU, Versi 1.2 atau lebih baru yang diterbitkan oleh Free Software Foundation; tanpa Bagian Invarian, tanpa Teks Sampul Depan, dan tanpa Teks Sampul Belakang. Salinan lisensi dimasukkan ke bagian yang berjudul Lisensi Dokumentasi Bebas GNU.http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.htmlGFDLGNU Free Documentation Licensetruetrue
Anda dapat memilih lisensi pilihan Anda.
The categories of this image need checking. You can do sohere.
Please remove redundant categories and try to put this image in the most specific category/categories.
You can remove this template by clicking here (or on the first line).
I’m not an expert (I came here to see what “ecliptic” meant), but based upon the article (e.g., “The ecliptic is the apparent path of the Sun on the celestial sphere” and “The ecliptic is the path the Sun appears to trace through the stars”), it appears to me that the error in this picture is that they’re showing a small depiction of the “earth revolves around the sun” viewpoint within the “sun revolves around the earth” viewpoint. The former should be removed and the sun should be shown to be on the “great circle,” the circle on which (per the “sun revolves around the earth” viewpoint) the Sun appears to move as it “orbits the Earth.” Trying to illustrate two conflicting ideas in a drawing presented as representing one of those two ideas is counter-productive to the use of a drawing to help clarify the point.
I would add that it’s not clear to say that “The ecliptic is the apparent path of the Sun on the celestial sphere.” That’s only the apparent path if your presumption is that the earth and stars are stationary and the sun is revolving around the earth. It’s been quite a while since that was the first thought that entered one’s mind as the explanation for the sun’s movement across the sky, so that isn’t a description that quickly conveys the desired idea to the modern reader. Given that I'm not an expert on the subject and might be missing something, however, I hesitate to just jump in and edit someone else's article. I'm just adding comments that may help others figure this out in less time.
Captions
Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents
{{Information |Description=Diagram of Earth's orbit, showing ecliptic plane, ecliptic poles, celestial equator, and celestial poles on the celestial sphere |Date=19 Mar 2012 |Source={{own}} |Author= ~~~~ }}